Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 25% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 92% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 92% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 99% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 50% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 3.45 W |
| Power Density | 3.281 W/in³ More power-dense than 62% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.7776 oz-in/g Stronger than 38% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 118.88 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 51% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.33168 (1/sec·g) Faster than 97% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 8.37 Better balanced than 10% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0256 A/oz-in More efficient than 21% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.250 Lower idle draw than 22% of 112 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 40.00 Narrower current spread than 23% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 15.59%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 50% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 34% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 31% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S3215
Be the first to review!
