Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 21% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 94% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 92% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 98% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 42% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 3.42 W |
| Power Density | 3.256 W/in³ More power-dense than 62% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.4689 oz-in/g Stronger than 31% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 105.67 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 44% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.37037 (1/sec·g) Faster than 98% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 6.67 Better balanced than 8% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0324 A/oz-in More efficient than 11% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.250 Lower idle draw than 20% of 112 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 45.00 Narrower current spread than 17% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 14.29%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 43% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 34% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 30% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS BLS3315
Be the first to review!
