Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-26
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 24% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 36% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 73% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 81% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.44–2.35 W |
| Power Density | 1.238 W/in³ More power-dense than 25% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.2304 oz-in/g Stronger than 26% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 65.72 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 24% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.11161 (1/sec·g) Faster than 49% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 19.98 Better balanced than 35% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0184 A/oz-in More efficient than 33% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 18.55%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 72% of 873 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 27.78%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 97% of 874 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 15% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 55% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S3009D
Be the first to review!
