Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-08
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 76% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 48% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 21% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Running Current | Above Average Lower draw than 71% of 50 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.29–1.64 W |
| Power Density | 0.863 W/in³ More power-dense than 71% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.2357 oz-in/g Stronger than 74% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 65.88 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 76% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09921 (1/sec·g) Faster than 25% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 22.54 Better balanced than 76% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 31.250 Lower idle draw than 0% of 39 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 11.12%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 34% of 145 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 10.43%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 16% of 147 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 22% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0025 4th-highest dead-band-to-pulse-width ratio of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of FeeTech FS5109M
Be the first to review!
