Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 29% of 60 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 12% of 59 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 61% of 103 Digital Slim servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 29% of 36 Digital Slim servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.54–1.69 W |
| Power Density | 3.970 W/in³ More power-dense than 60% of 99 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque Density | 2.5129 oz-in/g Stronger than 20% of 60 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 123.62 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 53% of 60 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.26455 (1/sec·g) Faster than 36% of 59 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 9.50 Better balanced than 55% of 59 Digital Slim servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0398 A/oz-in More efficient than 19% of 671 Hobby servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 21.00 Narrower current spread than 27% of 282 Hobby servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 21.68%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 87% of 56 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 23.53%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 83% of 55 Digital Slim servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 54% of 93 Digital Slim servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 50% of 27 Digital Slim servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MG2107WHV
Be the first to review!
