Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Bottom 10% Stronger than 3% of 186 Digital Low Profile servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 3% of 183 Digital Low Profile servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 99% of 304 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 92% of 27 Digital Low Profile servos at 5.0V |
| Stall Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 91% of 81 Digital Low Profile servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.54–1.69 W |
| Power Density | 3.970 W/in³ More power-dense than 55% of 273 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Torque Density | 2.5129 oz-in/g Stronger than 36% of 185 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 123.62 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 61% of 186 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.26455 (1/sec·g) Faster than 82% of 182 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 9.50 Better balanced than 22% of 183 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0398 A/oz-in More efficient than 16% of 58 Digital Low Profile servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 21.00 Narrower current spread than 37% of 20 Low Profile servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 21.68%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 88% of 164 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 23.53%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 90% of 163 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 62% of 276 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 55% of 79 Digital Low Profile servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MG2107WHV
Be the first to review!
