Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 82% of 40 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 28% of 41 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 29% of 83 Digital Slim servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 29% of 29 Digital Slim servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.16–2.82 W |
| Power Density | 4.384 W/in³ More power-dense than 67% of 83 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque Density | 3.8164 oz-in/g Stronger than 85% of 40 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 155.20 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 72% of 40 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.23855 (1/sec·g) Faster than 28% of 41 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 16.00 Better balanced than 85% of 40 Digital Slim servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0210 A/oz-in More efficient than 48% of 707 Hobby servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 21.00 Narrower current spread than 29% of 350 Hobby servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.52%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 41% of 33 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 17.65%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 52% of 34 Digital Slim servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 51% of 75 Digital Slim servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 38% of 22 Digital Slim servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MG2611WHV
Be the first to review!
