Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Top 10% Stronger than 92% of 60 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 24% of 59 Digital Slim servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 26% of 103 Digital Slim servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 26% of 36 Digital Slim servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.16–2.82 W |
| Power Density | 4.384 W/in³ More power-dense than 72% of 99 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque Density | 3.8164 oz-in/g 5th-highest torque density of 60 Digital Slim servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 155.20 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 86% of 60 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.23855 (1/sec·g) Faster than 21% of 59 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 16.00 Better balanced than 91% of 59 Digital Slim servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0210 A/oz-in More efficient than 48% of 671 Hobby servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 21.00 Narrower current spread than 27% of 282 Hobby servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.52%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 42% of 56 Digital Slim servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 17.65%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 56% of 55 Digital Slim servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 53% of 93 Digital Slim servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 46% of 27 Digital Slim servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MG2611WHV
Be the first to review!
