Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 78% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 45% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 82% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 27% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 11% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 4.77–12.84 W |
| Power Density | 11.788 W/in³ More power-dense than 99% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 6.9437 oz-in/g Stronger than 92% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 331.52 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 96% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.13736 (1/sec·g) Faster than 64% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 50.55 Better balanced than 76% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0197 A/oz-in More efficient than 34% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 15.78 Narrower current spread than 57% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.84%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 51% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 22.06%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 87% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 70% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 54% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MGB5216HV
Be the first to review!
