Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop NowTechnical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-08
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 43% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 26% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 61% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 70% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.11–3.12 W |
| Power Density | 1.708 W/in³ More power-dense than 37% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 3.2333 oz-in/g Stronger than 46% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 106.32 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 45% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09804 (1/sec·g) Faster than 33% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 32.98 Better balanced than 56% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0139 A/oz-in More efficient than 56% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.46%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 48% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 15.32%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 49% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 33% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0013 Finer dead band than 58% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews (1)
-
1
April 29, 2020Application(s): ff
Comments: 1
