Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-09
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Top 10% Stronger than 94% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 85% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 17% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 51% of 50 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 5% of 64 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.57–3.21 W |
| Power Density | 1.689 W/in³ More power-dense than 96% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 3.3521 oz-in/g Stronger than 95% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 102.30 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 95% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.12315 (1/sec·g) Faster than 64% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 27.22 Better balanced than 84% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0165 A/oz-in More efficient than 63% of 58 Analog Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.100 Lower idle draw than 26% of 39 Analog Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 16.00 Narrower current spread than 8% of 37 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 84% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0040 Finer dead band than 58% of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S0150
Be the first to review!
