Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Top 10% Stronger than 92% of 1055 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 83% of 1038 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Weight | Bottom 10% Lighter than 6% of 1872 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 6% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 18% of 569 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 10.56–16.05 W |
| Power Density | 8.123 W/in³ More power-dense than 94% of 1762 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 6.1908 oz-in/g Stronger than 89% of 1048 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 260.07 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 92% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.13387 (1/sec·g) Faster than 64% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 46.24 Better balanced than 72% of 1029 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0107 A/oz-in More efficient than 76% of 330 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.001 1st-highest idle-to-running current ratio of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.38 Narrower current spread than 92% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 5.0 V Wider voltage range than 97% of 1552 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0005 Finer dead band than 97% of 501 Digital Standard servos |
Notes
Also comes in a 180 or 270 degree version.
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of E-Power HV8050GS
Be the first to review!
