Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-27
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Top 10% Stronger than 97% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 41% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Weight | Bottom 10% Lighter than 6% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 7% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 10.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 19% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 8.22–14.01 W |
| Power Density | 7.090 W/in³ More power-dense than 91% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 8.0328 oz-in/g Stronger than 97% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 337.44 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 97% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.08032 (1/sec·g) Faster than 15% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 100.01 Better balanced than 97% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0082 A/oz-in More efficient than 91% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.113 Lower idle draw than 31% of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.38 Narrower current spread than 93% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 5.0 V Wider voltage range than 97% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0005 Finer dead band than 99% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Notes
Also comes in a 180 or 270 degree version.
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of E-Power HB8160GS
Be the first to review!
