Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 40% of 88 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 6% of 89 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 27% of 168 Digital Giant servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 50% of 29 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 66% of 108 Digital Giant servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 4.36 W |
| Power Density | 0.482 W/in³ More power-dense than 8% of 136 Digital Giant servos |
| Torque Density | 2.1240 oz-in/g Stronger than 29% of 85 Digital Giant servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 79.82 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 33% of 88 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.00961 (1/sec·g) Faster than 16% of 86 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 220.96 Better balanced than 69% of 85 Digital Giant servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0075 A/oz-in More efficient than 35% of 47 Digital Giant servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.053 Lower idle draw than 55% of 23 Digital Giant servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 9.47 Narrower current spread than 58% of 27 Digital Giant servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 0.0 V Wider voltage range than 3% of 160 Digital Giant servos |
| Backlash-to-Range Ratio | 0.00028 Tighter backlash than 85% of 49 Digital Giant servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Dynamixel PH42-020-S300-R
Be the first to review!
