Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 38% of 93 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 6% of 90 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 28% of 174 Digital Giant servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 54% of 29 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Stall Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 1% of 102 Digital Giant servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 4.36 W |
| Power Density | 0.482 W/in³ More power-dense than 11% of 132 Digital Giant servos |
| Torque Density | 2.1240 oz-in/g Stronger than 30% of 90 Digital Giant servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 79.82 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 33% of 93 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.00961 (1/sec·g) Faster than 17% of 87 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 220.96 Better balanced than 70% of 89 Digital Giant servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 7.4776 A/oz-in More efficient than 2% of 50 Digital Giant servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.053 Lower idle draw than 24% of 22 Dynamixel servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 9,473.68 Narrower current spread than 0% of 27 Digital Giant servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 0.0 V Wider voltage range than 3% of 160 Digital Giant servos |
| Backlash-to-Range Ratio | 0.00028 Tighter backlash than 86% of 43 Digital Giant servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Dynamixel PH42-020-S300-R
Be the first to review!
