Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-09
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 30% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 95% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 93% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Running Current | Above Average Lower draw than 65% of 50 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 81% of 64 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.55–0.75 W |
| Power Density | 0.394 W/in³ More power-dense than 29% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.3503 oz-in/g Stronger than 34% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 25.58 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 25% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.23148 (1/sec·g) 3rd-highest speed-to-weight of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 5.83 Better balanced than 2% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0185 A/oz-in More efficient than 51% of 58 Analog Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.125 Lower idle draw than 11% of 39 Analog Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 5.63 Narrower current spread than 72% of 37 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 84% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0040 Finer dead band than 56% of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S3003
Be the first to review!
