Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-25
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Bottom 10% Stronger than 8% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 100% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 29% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 96% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 38% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 3.99–6.42 W |
| Power Density | 3.340 W/in³ More power-dense than 64% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 0.8682 oz-in/g Stronger than 1% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 32.52 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 5% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.47893 (1/sec·g) Faster than 99% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 1.81 Better balanced than 0% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0640 A/oz-in More efficient than 2% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.250 Lower idle draw than 9% of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 50.00 Narrower current spread than 10% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 55% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0030 Finer dead band than 9% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Cys BLS5808
Be the first to review!
