Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 74% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 96% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 17% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 55% of 50 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 21% of 64 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.93–2.57 W |
| Power Density | 1.351 W/in³ More power-dense than 91% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.1550 oz-in/g Stronger than 68% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 65.77 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 75% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.14368 (1/sec·g) Faster than 76% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 15.00 Better balanced than 57% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0184 A/oz-in More efficient than 53% of 58 Analog Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.100 Lower idle draw than 32% of 39 Analog Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 11.50 Narrower current spread than 22% of 37 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 85% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0040 Finer dead band than 60% of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S0090
Be the first to review!
