Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-09-19
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 56% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 32% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 72% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 63% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 57% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.89–3.94 W |
| Power Density | 1.999 W/in³ More power-dense than 44% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 4.4625 oz-in/g Stronger than 69% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 126.72 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 55% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.11161 (1/sec·g) Faster than 47% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 39.98 Better balanced than 64% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0120 A/oz-in More efficient than 66% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 16.67 Narrower current spread than 50% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.2 V Wider voltage range than 42% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0015 Finer dead band than 52% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S3218M
Be the first to review!
