Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-26
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 17% of 229 Low Profile servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 2% of 227 Low Profile servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 88% of 53 Analog Low Profile servos |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 88% of 90 Low Profile servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.35–0.41 W |
| Power Density | 0.298 W/in³ More power-dense than 13% of 53 Analog Low Profile servos |
| Torque Density | 3.1467 oz-in/g Stronger than 37% of 69 XQ-Power servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 68.10 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 26% of 69 XQ-Power servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.06667 (1/sec·g) Faster than 13% of 70 XQ-Power servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 47.20 Better balanced than 76% of 68 XQ-Power servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0212 A/oz-in More efficient than 33% of 59 XQ-Power servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 7.33%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 19% of 59 XQ-Power servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 7.22%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 9% of 58 XQ-Power servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 32% of 26 Analog Low Profile servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0029 Finer dead band than 22% of 55 XQ-Power servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S3007B
Be the first to review!
