Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-26
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 53% of 198 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 53% of 195 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 22% of 447 Analog Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 32% of 63 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.86–1.09 W |
| Power Density | 0.559 W/in³ More power-dense than 48% of 432 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.4875 oz-in/g Stronger than 42% of 198 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 42.72 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 52% of 198 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09921 (1/sec·g) Faster than 26% of 195 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 15.00 Better balanced than 56% of 195 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0240 A/oz-in More efficient than 17% of 54 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 11.10%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 33% of 156 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 10.43%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 19% of 156 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 25% of 239 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0029 Finer dead band than 82% of 56 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S3006M
Be the first to review!
