Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 52% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 50% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 22% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 33% of 64 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.86–1.09 W |
| Power Density | 0.559 W/in³ More power-dense than 47% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.4875 oz-in/g Stronger than 41% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 42.72 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 51% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09921 (1/sec·g) Faster than 26% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 15.00 Better balanced than 56% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0240 A/oz-in More efficient than 19% of 58 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 11.10%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 33% of 145 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 10.43%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 20% of 147 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 25% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0029 Finer dead band than 79% of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S3006M
Be the first to review!
