Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-25
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 55% of 1055 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 68% of 1872 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 63% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 79% of 569 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 3.51 W |
| Power Density | 1.834 W/in³ More power-dense than 40% of 1762 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 4.1548 oz-in/g Stronger than 64% of 1048 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 124.86 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 54% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.11594 (1/sec·g) |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 35.84 |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0105 A/oz-in More efficient than 77% of 330 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.033 Lower idle draw than 70% of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 13.89 Narrower current spread than 66% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.98%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 52% of 868 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 16% of 1552 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 83% of 501 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-RS420
Be the first to review!
