Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop NowTechnical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-27
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 58% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 22% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 45% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 92% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.57–3.42 W |
| Power Density | 1.887 W/in³ More power-dense than 41% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 3.8457 oz-in/g Stronger than 57% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 137.77 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 60% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.08547 (1/sec·g) Faster than 19% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 45.00 Better balanced than 70% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0064 A/oz-in More efficient than 96% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.8 V Wider voltage range than 39% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews (9)
Includes 8 reviews aggregated from around the web.
There are very few reviews for this servo on the web. One Reddit user reports difficulty getting newly bought MG958 servos to work reliably. It is unclear whether the cause was the servos or the setup.
-
Paola
August 23, 2016Application(s): robots
Comments: its the ideal servo
