Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-25
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 85% of 1061 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 54% of 1044 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Bottom 10% Lighter than 1% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 24% of 227 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 46% of 569 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 4.0968 oz-in/g Stronger than 63% of 1054 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 207.74 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 84% of 1059 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.07692 (1/sec·g) Faster than 11% of 1037 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 53.26 Better balanced than 80% of 1035 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0083 A/oz-in More efficient than 90% of 329 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 8.50 Narrower current spread than 77% of 180 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 9.89%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 18% of 873 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 8.34%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 9% of 873 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 72% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0015 Finer dead band than 50% of 496 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Miuzei MS80
Be the first to review!
