Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-07-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 67% of 845 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 17% of 833 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 57% of 1819 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 100% of 76 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 84% of 403 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 4.7450 oz-in/g Stronger than 74% of 834 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 140.80 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 62% of 845 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09259 (1/sec·g) Faster than 26% of 823 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 51.25 Better balanced than 78% of 828 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0077 A/oz-in More efficient than 94% of 232 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 550.00 Narrower current spread than 25% of 49 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 5.61%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 5% of 674 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 14.30%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 45% of 688 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.0 V Wider voltage range than 41% of 1272 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0015 Finer dead band than 53% of 329 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Miuzei DS3218
Be the first to review!
