Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-09
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 65% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 15% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 39% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 43% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.85–4.25 W |
| Power Density | 1.474 W/in³ More power-dense than 31% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 4.2500 oz-in/g Stronger than 65% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 98.71 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 41% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.08068 (1/sec·g) Faster than 14% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 52.68 Better balanced than 79% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0123 A/oz-in More efficient than 64% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.050 |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 29.17 |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 55% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 26% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Feetech FT6325M
Be the first to review!
