Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-22
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 65% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 16% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 40% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 44% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.85–4.25 W |
| Power Density | 1.474 W/in³ More power-dense than 31% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 4.2500 oz-in/g Stronger than 66% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 98.71 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 42% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.08068 (1/sec·g) Faster than 15% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 52.68 Better balanced than 79% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0123 A/oz-in More efficient than 64% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.050 |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 29.17 |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 55% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 27% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Feetech FT6325M
Be the first to review!
