Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop NowTechnical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 55% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 28% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 44% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Above Average Lower draw than 74% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 85% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.69 W |
| Power Density | 1.407 W/in³ More power-dense than 29% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 3.7397 oz-in/g Stronger than 54% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 127.12 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 55% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09212 (1/sec·g) Faster than 27% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 40.59 Better balanced than 65% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0086 A/oz-in More efficient than 87% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.046 Lower idle draw than 62% of 112 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 16.15 Narrower current spread than 53% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 0.0 V Wider voltage range than 0% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 26% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Feetech FT5118M
Be the first to review!
