Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 87% of 1055 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 83% of 1038 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 21% of 1872 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 12% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 33% of 569 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 8.56–12.84 W |
| Power Density | 6.499 W/in³ More power-dense than 88% of 1762 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 5.5560 oz-in/g Stronger than 84% of 1048 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 210.90 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 85% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.14815 (1/sec·g) Faster than 72% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 37.50 Better balanced than 61% of 1029 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0101 A/oz-in More efficient than 79% of 330 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.094 Lower idle draw than 39% of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.31 Narrower current spread than 94% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 52% of 1552 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0005 Finer dead band than 98% of 501 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of E-Power D5535GS
Be the first to review!
