Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 86% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 82% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 20% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 14% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 32% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 8.56–12.84 W |
| Power Density | 6.499 W/in³ More power-dense than 87% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 5.5560 oz-in/g Stronger than 83% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 210.90 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 84% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.14815 (1/sec·g) Faster than 70% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 37.50 Better balanced than 61% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0101 A/oz-in More efficient than 78% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.094 Lower idle draw than 45% of 112 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.31 Narrower current spread than 92% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 52% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0005 Finer dead band than 98% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of E-Power D5535GS
Be the first to review!
