Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 14% of 93 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 8% of 90 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 10% of 174 Digital Giant servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 21% of 29 Digital Giant servos at 24.0V |
| Stall Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 0% of 102 Digital Giant servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 0.4532 oz-in/g Stronger than 1% of 90 Digital Giant servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 17.28 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 1% of 93 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.00387 (1/sec·g) Faster than 9% of 87 Digital Giant servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 117.01 Better balanced than 41% of 89 Digital Giant servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 26.0655 A/oz-in More efficient than 0% of 50 Digital Giant servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.013 Lower idle draw than 62% of 22 Dynamixel servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 3,366.67 Narrower current spread than 4% of 27 Digital Giant servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 0.0 V Wider voltage range than 1% of 160 Digital Giant servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Dynamixel PM54-060-S250-R
Be the first to review!
