Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 77% of 262 Digital Mini servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Bottom 10% Faster than 8% of 263 Digital Mini servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 12% of 466 Digital Mini servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 16% of 76 Digital Mini servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.00–1.46 W |
| Power Density | 1.480 W/in³ More power-dense than 45% of 440 Digital Mini servos |
| Torque Density | 2.5587 oz-in/g Stronger than 58% of 258 Digital Mini servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 98.88 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 68% of 262 Digital Mini servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.14620 (1/sec·g) Faster than 2% of 259 Digital Mini servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 17.50 Better balanced than 91% of 261 Digital Mini servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0309 A/oz-in More efficient than 47% of 52 Digital Mini servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.31%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 42% of 232 Digital Mini servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 14.29%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 38% of 235 Digital Mini servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 42% of 351 Digital Mini servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 36% of 77 Digital Mini servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Cys S8255
Be the first to review!
