Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop NowTechnical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Bottom 10% Stronger than 1% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 55% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 98% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 95% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.59–0.82 W |
| Power Density | 0.729 W/in³ More power-dense than 10% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.3890 oz-in/g Stronger than 9% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 37.15 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 7% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.25641 (1/sec·g) Faster than 91% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 5.42 Better balanced than 7% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0312 A/oz-in More efficient than 12% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 13.90%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 39% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 15.17%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 48% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 11% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0040 Finer dead band than 3% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Cys S0300
Be the first to review!
