Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 57% of 192 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 96% of 190 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 37% of 448 Analog Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 57% of 50 Analog Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 56% of 64 Analog Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.10–1.39 W |
| Power Density | 0.741 W/in³ More power-dense than 65% of 437 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.7360 oz-in/g Stronger than 52% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 48.10 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 55% of 192 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.16026 (1/sec·g) Faster than 89% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 10.83 Better balanced than 38% of 190 Analog Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0144 A/oz-in More efficient than 75% of 58 Analog Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.100 Lower idle draw than 34% of 39 Analog Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 6.50 Narrower current spread than 56% of 37 Analog Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 86% of 229 Analog Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0040 Finer dead band than 63% of 49 Analog Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S0060
Be the first to review!
