Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 64% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 68% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 40% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 39% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 31% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 4.67–12.45 W |
| Power Density | 8.335 W/in³ More power-dense than 94% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 4.2121 oz-in/g Stronger than 64% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 186.07 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 76% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.13774 (1/sec·g) Faster than 64% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 30.58 Better balanced than 53% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0158 A/oz-in More efficient than 48% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 14.67 Narrower current spread than 60% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 17.99%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 71% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 17.16%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 60% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 79% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 72% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of AGFRC A66BHLW
Be the first to review!
