Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-25
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 36% of 160 Analog Micro servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 49% of 160 Analog Micro servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 60% of 336 Analog Micro servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 43% of 48 Analog Micro servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.26–0.30 W |
| Power Density | 0.909 W/in³ More power-dense than 56% of 322 Analog Micro servos |
| Torque Density | 2.0875 oz-in/g Stronger than 47% of 160 Analog Micro servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 50.18 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 47% of 160 Analog Micro servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 1.04167 (1/sec·g) Faster than 66% of 160 Analog Micro servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 2.00 Better balanced than 37% of 159 Analog Micro servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0479 A/oz-in More efficient than 35% of 38 Analog Micro servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 6.49%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 3% of 101 Analog Micro servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 7.58%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 8% of 101 Analog Micro servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 40% of 174 Analog Micro servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0043 Finer dead band than 39% of 42 Analog Micro servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of XQ-Power XQ-S0008S
Be the first to review!
