Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-25
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 78% of 186 Digital Low Profile servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 56% of 183 Digital Low Profile servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 38% of 304 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 33% of 81 Digital Low Profile servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 4.67–8.21 W |
| Power Density | 6.130 W/in³ More power-dense than 75% of 273 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Torque Density | 4.4037 oz-in/g Stronger than 85% of 185 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 179.17 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 83% of 186 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.19314 (1/sec·g) Faster than 46% of 182 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 22.80 Better balanced than 76% of 183 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0175 A/oz-in More efficient than 60% of 58 Digital Low Profile servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 9.77 |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 10.76%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 18% of 164 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 16.55%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 62% of 163 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 37% of 276 Digital Low Profile servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 62% of 79 Digital Low Profile servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Shift RC XLP
Be the first to review!
