Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 89% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 23% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Bottom 10% Lighter than 2% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 52% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 20% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 5.13–12.84 W |
| Power Density | 6.352 W/in³ More power-dense than 87% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 5.4915 oz-in/g Stronger than 83% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 240.39 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 89% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.06457 (1/sec·g) Faster than 4% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 85.04 Better balanced than 94% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0107 A/oz-in More efficient than 75% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 20.00 Narrower current spread than 42% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.89%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 52% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 16.41%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 54% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 76% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 64% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Shift RC s2.0
Be the first to review!
