Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 20% of 1044 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 73% of 1030 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 97% of 1898 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 51% of 550 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 3.0556 oz-in/g Stronger than 43% of 1039 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 100.91 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 43% of 1043 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.25484 (1/sec·g) Faster than 92% of 1025 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 11.99 Better balanced than 17% of 1021 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0282 A/oz-in More efficient than 15% of 321 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 12.63%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 31% of 845 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 19.53%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 77% of 855 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 74% of 1551 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0017 Finer dead band than 37% of 482 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Promodeler DS160CLHV
Be the first to review!
