Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-07-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 23% of 844 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 71% of 832 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Top 10% Lighter than 96% of 1818 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 51% of 403 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 3.0556 oz-in/g Stronger than 47% of 833 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 100.91 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 45% of 844 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.25484 (1/sec·g) Faster than 89% of 822 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 11.99 Better balanced than 21% of 827 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0282 A/oz-in More efficient than 20% of 232 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 12.63%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 30% of 674 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 19.53%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 77% of 688 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 76% of 1271 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0017 Finer dead band than 38% of 329 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Promodeler DS160CLHV
Be the first to review!
