Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-09
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 42% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 63% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 32% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 52% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 2.85–5.19 W |
| Power Density | 2.656 W/in³ More power-dense than 54% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.6277 oz-in/g Stronger than 36% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 94.58 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 39% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.11856 (1/sec·g) Faster than 52% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 22.16 Better balanced than 39% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0168 A/oz-in More efficient than 44% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 15.29%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 47% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 13.89%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 42% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 60% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MKS HBL950
Be the first to review!
