Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 56% of 349 Digital Micro servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 37% of 347 Digital Micro servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 47% of 597 Digital Micro servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 51% of 60 Digital Micro servos at 4.8V |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.47–0.64 W |
| Power Density | 1.501 W/in³ More power-dense than 40% of 563 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque Density | 2.7773 oz-in/g Stronger than 62% of 349 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 71.43 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 46% of 345 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.75758 (1/sec·g) Faster than 55% of 347 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 3.67 Better balanced than 59% of 345 Digital Micro servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.824 Lower idle draw than 0% of 42 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 11.37%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 18% of 290 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 16.67%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 39% of 295 Digital Micro servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.2 V Wider voltage range than 7% of 496 Digital Micro servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0014 Finer dead band than 54% of 182 Digital Micro servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of MacGregor RC MG1003DS
Be the first to review!
