Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop NowTechnical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-22
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 15% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 84% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Average Lower draw than 64% of 226 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 94% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.28 W |
| Power Density | 0.703 W/in³ More power-dense than 9% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 1.7115 oz-in/g Stronger than 15% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 48.78 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 14% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.12821 (1/sec·g) |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 13.35 |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0157 A/oz-in More efficient than 45% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.071 Lower idle draw than 42% of 167 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 8.24 Narrower current spread than 79% of 179 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 12.04%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 29% of 873 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 33% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0027 Finer dead band than 10% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews (1)
Includes 1 review aggregated from around the web.
There are very few reviews for this servo on the web. A German modeler reports one of these started smoking during adjustment on a bench and died before he could switch it off.
Be the first to review!
