Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-23Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Below Average Stronger than 24% of 349 Digital Micro servos at 3.7V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 53% of 347 Digital Micro servos at 3.7V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 70% of 597 Digital Micro servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.33–2.11 W |
| Power Density | 9.864 W/in³ More power-dense than 96% of 563 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque Density | 2.2091 oz-in/g Stronger than 39% of 349 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 91.07 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 66% of 345 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 1.03306 (1/sec·g) Faster than 76% of 347 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 2.14 Better balanced than 27% of 345 Digital Micro servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 41.04%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 98% of 290 Digital Micro servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 25.53%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 87% of 295 Digital Micro servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 4.7 V Wider voltage range than 96% of 496 Digital Micro servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews (3)
Includes 3 reviews aggregated from around the web.
There are few reviews for this servo on the web. One glider flyer highly recommends it as a cheaper alternative to a well-known competitor, citing centering that is as good and a telemetry feature set. A second owner found the programming setup frustrating at first but called the servo itself very nice on the bench. One early test unit centered poorly until the transmitter calibration was corrected.
Be the first to review!
