Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-09
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Bottom 10% Stronger than 7% of 170 Analog Micro servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Top 10% Faster than 94% of 170 Analog Micro servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Above Average Lighter than 83% of 346 Analog Micro servos |
| Running Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 100% of 33 Analog Micro servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Above Average Lower draw than 72% of 54 Analog Micro servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 0.13–0.17 W |
| Power Density | 0.973 W/in³ More power-dense than 61% of 333 Analog Micro servos |
| Torque Density | 1.8864 oz-in/g Stronger than 34% of 170 Analog Micro servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 47.36 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 44% of 170 Analog Micro servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 2.52525 (1/sec·g) Faster than 96% of 170 Analog Micro servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 0.75 Better balanced than 3% of 169 Analog Micro servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0602 A/oz-in More efficient than 16% of 45 Analog Micro servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.100 Lower idle draw than 23% of 23 Analog Micro servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 8.33 Narrower current spread than 4% of 25 Analog Micro servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 97% of 182 Analog Micro servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0033 Finer dead band than 76% of 43 Analog Micro servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of FeeTech FS0307
Be the first to review!
