Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-08
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 89% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 62% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 15% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 6% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 19% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 7.28–11.70 W |
| Power Density | 5.922 W/in³ More power-dense than 84% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 6.0546 oz-in/g Stronger than 88% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 239.02 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 89% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.10684 (1/sec·g) Faster than 42% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 56.67 Better balanced than 83% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0116 A/oz-in More efficient than 69% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.071 Lower idle draw than 49% of 112 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.22 Narrower current spread than 96% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 2.4 V Wider voltage range than 52% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0005 Finer dead band than 99% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Notes
Also comes in a 180 or 270 degree version.
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of E-Power HB7545GS
Be the first to review!
