Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-23
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Above Average Stronger than 90% of 1053 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Below Average Faster than 17% of 1035 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 59% of 1877 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 3% of 222 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Stall Current | Below Average Lower draw than 16% of 565 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Torque Density | 8.1010 oz-in/g Stronger than 97% of 1046 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 257.82 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 91% of 1051 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09259 (1/sec·g) Faster than 28% of 1028 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 87.50 Better balanced than 94% of 1026 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0119 A/oz-in More efficient than 68% of 327 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 1.16 4th-highest no-load vs stall current spread of 176 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 13.45%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 36% of 863 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 18.73%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 72% of 863 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 69% of 1554 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 61% of 491 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of DSServo RDS3245
Be the first to review!
