Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-10
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 60% of 262 Digital Mini servos at 6.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 84% of 263 Digital Mini servos at 6.0V |
| Weight | Average Lighter than 55% of 466 Digital Mini servos |
| Running Current | Above Average Lower draw than 78% of 28 Digital Mini servos at 6.0V |
| Stall Current | Top 10% Lower draw than 96% of 76 Digital Mini servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 1.03–1.60 W |
| Power Density | 1.669 W/in³ More power-dense than 54% of 440 Digital Mini servos |
| Torque Density | 2.7776 oz-in/g Stronger than 63% of 258 Digital Mini servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 72.20 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 44% of 262 Digital Mini servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.50000 (1/sec·g) Faster than 82% of 259 Digital Mini servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 5.56 Better balanced than 32% of 261 Digital Mini servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0130 A/oz-in 2nd-highest current-per-torque ratio of 52 Digital Mini servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.167 Lower idle draw than 58% of 44 Cys servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 7.50 Narrower current spread than 84% of 44 Cys servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 1.4 V Wider voltage range than 45% of 351 Digital Mini servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0020 Finer dead band than 43% of 77 Digital Mini servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of CYS S8202
Be the first to review!
