Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-24
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Average Stronger than 52% of 1060 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Speed | Above Average Faster than 65% of 1045 Digital Standard servos at 5.0V |
| Weight | Bottom 10% Lighter than 8% of 1880 Digital Standard servos |
| Stall Current | Average Lower draw than 42% of 570 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 3.42–7.13 W |
| Power Density | 3.662 W/in³ More power-dense than 68% of 1768 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 2.7102 oz-in/g Stronger than 37% of 1053 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 114.09 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 51% of 1058 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.10163 (1/sec·g) Faster than 38% of 1038 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 26.67 Better balanced than 47% of 1034 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0162 A/oz-in More efficient than 45% of 331 Digital Standard servos |
| Idle-to-Running Current Ratio | 0.147 |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 12.00 |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 16.54%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 56% of 873 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 9.81%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 16% of 874 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.4 V Wider voltage range than 72% of 1560 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0008 Finer dead band than 88% of 504 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of Corona BL1029HV
Be the first to review!
