Discover XQ-Power Servos in Our eBay Store!
Shop Now
Technical Specifications
Last Updated: 2026-10-08
Weight
Dimensions
Torque
Speed
Current
Temp
Wire
Disclaimer: Most data is sourced from the manufacturer. Some data is sourced from our loyal community and with the help of AI. We aim for accuracy but are not responsible for inaccurate information.
Class Comparison
| Torque | Top 10% Stronger than 95% of 1043 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Speed | Average Faster than 43% of 1041 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Weight | Below Average Lighter than 19% of 1902 Digital Standard servos |
| Running Current | Below Average Lower draw than 27% of 173 Digital Standard servos at 4.8V |
| Stall Current | Bottom 10% Lower draw than 9% of 539 Digital Standard servos |
Performance Analysis
| Shaft Power | 7.26–15.42 W |
| Power Density | 10.321 W/in³ More power-dense than 98% of 1759 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Density | 7.5066 oz-in/g Stronger than 95% of 1036 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque-to-Volume Ratio | 380.84 oz-in/in³ Denser torque than 98% of 1042 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-to-Weight | 0.09098 (1/sec·g) Faster than 26% of 1033 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed-Torque Trade-off | 82.50 Better balanced than 92% of 1031 Digital Standard servos |
| Current-per-Torque Ratio | 0.0132 A/oz-in More efficient than 60% of 315 Digital Standard servos |
| No-Load vs Stall Current Spread | 16.30 Narrower current spread than 52% of 132 Digital Standard servos |
| Torque Gain per Volt | 12.94%/V More voltage-responsive (torque) than 33% of 850 Digital Standard servos |
| Speed Gain per Volt | 12.50%/V More voltage-responsive (speed) than 33% of 871 Digital Standard servos |
| Voltage Range Width | 3.6 V Wider voltage range than 80% of 1539 Digital Standard servos |
| Dead-Band-to-Pulse-Width Ratio | 0.0010 Finer dead band than 75% of 468 Digital Standard servos |
Similar Active Servos
Reviews of AGFRC A66FHLW
Be the first to review!
